Messi

Leden
  • Content count

    1,235
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

342 Excellent

About Messi

  • Rank
    Waterdrager
  • Birthday

Profile Information

  • Geslacht
    Niet vertellen
  • Interesses
    WK Scratch '15

Extra

  • Onderscheidingen
    Bk Scratch '15
    Bk Eliminatie '15

Recent Profile Visitors

920 profile views
  1. 1. Josepereira 30 2. guilherme 26 3. Messi 24 4. Tetrixnet 21 5. Gesink31 16 6. decastiago 13 Congrats jose Player 1 2 3 4 5 Total 1 josepereira 6 1 3 10 10 30 2 guilherme 10 4 6 2 4 26 3 Messi 3 10 1 4 6 24 4 TetrixNet 4 3 10 1 3 21 5 gesink31 1 6 2 6 1 16 6 decastiago 2 2 4 3 2 13
  2. 1. Messi 2. decastiago 3. Scuderia 4. Appeltaart 5. Ilyatroshin
  3. He probably passed us after the finish ...
  4. Guilherme 3 3 10 10 4 30 Messi 6 4 3 6 10 29 denberre 10 10 4 2 3 29 edMuitoDeus 4 6 6 4 6 26 Davi 2 2 2 3 2 11
  5. This is not the result of the scratch. I was 4th, tomas14 was 5th and then scuderia or sir devid.
  6. en de zilveren en bronze medailles?
  7. It's exactly the same, points race is also decided in the last sprint
  8. Re for host crash/technical problemIf the host crashes during points race, there will be a Re for the remaining sprints. For example: if the game crashed after 4 sprints, only the remaining 2 sprints will be played in the new race. So only the 1st and 2nd sprint will count in the new race then. The 2nd sprint would have double points, just like it would have in a contiguous points race. After the 2 sprints the host can take a screenshot and close the game. Sorry but I think this is a VERY BAD idea, positioning saving energy and stuff is everything in these kind of events. You can't just do a partial re.
  9. I know you don't change number of passing players but if you do a replay you have to make sure the majority of the players are there imo. If it's just a matter of showing up I think a place in the final is not deserved. Again my point of view.
  10. Ok I understand your point of view, but I disagree, from my point of view a complete re would have been more just. If you say chances of players that didn't pass is 0% then chances of players that did pass is 100% ... I also disagree with this because if AI is on hard you see it almost immediately, it was even said in chat if I understand correctly, and every player can take it into account and have equal chances. Now other people, of other groups, have less chances while they couldn't do anything about it.
  11. Well I think you made an elementary mistake in probability calculation. They were with 11 players the first time, 4 of these go through, this means a player has a 63,63% (7/11) chance to fail. In the replay they were with 3 so they have a 33,33% (1/3) chance to fail. Combining these statistics they have 21,20% to fail twice, so if you reverse it they have a 78,8% chance to pass. Even if you see it as 4/12 and 2/6 you get a 55,55% chance to pass.
  12. In my point of view it's just one that has to find the tactic and the other ones can just copy it. You could always spice things and make it more about ability by messing with the stats 888, 777, 666 ... ( let jarvis choose just before the event)
  13. I'm not sure about that statement though it was only 50sec with 4kms to go with 40 headwind, and he attacked from very far, so i doubt he had more energy than we had. But indeed we waited quiet a long time and also mentioned you here.
  14. I think it's strange to put 6 players from one group to the next round, certainly when there are so little players in the replay. If there are only 3 players and two go through to the final it's not an achievement.
  15. Online Nickname: Messi Nationality: Belgium Host (Yes or No): No